Pemikiran Ekonomi Islam dalam Era Kontemporer: Antara Etika, Keadilan, dan Tantangan Globalisasi
Main Article Content
Abstract
Contemporary Islamic economic thought has emerged as an intellectual response to the complexities of the modern global economy, particularly the dominance of capitalism, persistent economic inequality, and ethical deficiencies within prevailing economic systems. This article aims to examine the development and core characteristics of contemporary Islamic economics, its distinction from classical Islamic economic thought, as well as its theoretical implications and future direction within the broader landscape of global economic discourse. Employing a qualitative-descriptive approach through library research, this study analyzes the works of modern Islamic economic thinkers alongside relevant academic literature. The findings indicate that contemporary Islamic economics emphasizes the integration of market mechanisms with Islamic ethical values by positioning maqāṣid al-sharīʿah as a central analytical framework. While differing from classical Islamic economics in terms of context and methodological approach, its ultimate normative objective remains the pursuit of just and holistic human welfare. The study further identifies conceptual and implementation challenges that reflect an ongoing evolutionary process rather than a stagnation of thought. Theoretically, this research reinforces Islamic economics as a value-based economic paradigm, while practically it offers insights for developing more equitable, humane, and sustainable economic policies in the modern era.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Al-Ghazali. (2019). Etika Dan Keadilan Ekonomi Dalam Islam Kontemporer. Uin Press.
Astuti, R., Fadhilah, N., & Wahyuni, S. (2024). Relevansi Pemikiran Adam Smith Dalam Ekonomi Modern. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 18(1), 55–70.
Auda, J. (2010). Maqasid Al-Shariah As Philosophy Of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. International Institute Of Islamic Thought.
Chapra, M. U. (2000). The Future Of Economics: An Islamic Perspective. Islamic Foundation.
Chapra, M. U. (2008). The Islamic Vision Of Development In The Light Of Maqasid Al-Shariah. Islamic Research And Training Institute.
El-Gamal, M. A. (2006). Islamic Finance: Law, Economics, And Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Foley, D. K. (2006). Adam’s Fallacy: A Guide To Economic Theology. Harvard University Press.
Haneef, M. A., & Pramanik, A. R. (2015). Integration Of Islamic Economics And Mainstream Economics: A Critical Review. International Journal Of Islamic Economics And Finance Studies, 1(1), 1–20.
Islahi, A. A. (2015). Islamic Economics: A Survey Of The Literature. Islamic Research And Training Institute.
Kahf, M. (2014). Islamic Economics: Theory, Policy, And Social Justice. Islamic Development Bank.
Mirakhor, A., & Askari, H. (2017a). Islamic Economic Institutions And The Elimination Of Poverty. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Mirakhor, A., & Askari, H. (2017b). Islamic Economic System. John Wiley & Sons.
Nasution, F. (2022). Distribusi Kekayaan Dan Kebijakan Fiskal Dalam Ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Syariah, 8(2), 89–103.
Rahmawati, D., & Zulfikar, M. (2021). Reformasi Kebijakan Ekonomi Pasar Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 21(2), 45–59.
Siddiqi, M. N. (2001). Muslim Economic Thinking: A Survey Of Contemporary Literature. Islamic Foundation.
Siddiqi, M. N. (2004). Rethinking The Theory Of Interest. Islamic Foundation.
Sinollah, Bisri, M., & Adam, N. (2025). Kebebasan Pasar Dalam Ekonomi Islam: Antara Etika Dan Efisiensi. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam Kontemporer, 5(1), 45–62.
Siregar, R. (2023). Keadilan Sosial Dan Tantangan Liberalisasi Ekonomi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam Nusantara, 5(1), 17–32.
Syam, M. (2021). Kritik Terhadap Konsep Laissez Faire Dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Pembangunan. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Publik, 12(3), 201–215.
Zaman, A. (2012). Crisis In Islamic Economics: Diagnosis And Prescriptions. Islamic Studies, 49(1), 1–18.